
China will im Zuge der
One Belt One Road Investitionen (OBOR / B&R) auch einen maßgeschneiderten Investitionsschutzmechanismus mit den dazu gehörigen Streitbeilegungsinstanzen etablieren. Das geht aus einem
Beitrag in der Global Times hervor. Das Vorhaben wird als "extrem dringend" bezeichnet. In dem Text heißt es u.a.:
The existing dispute settlement regime cannot meet the increasing needs of the B&R. (...)
When it comes to the litigation mechanism, there are varied legal
systems in economies along the B&R, (...) [These] include the Continental
law system, the Anglo-American law system and the Islamic law system.
Moreover, most of the economies involved are developing countries, where
domestic legal systems are imperfect.(...)
As for arbitration and mediation, (...) [i]t can be expensive
and time-consuming to resort to international arbitration institutions.
The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
is one of the most important such institutions. But the average
arbitration fee per case at the ICSID is about $500,000, which is
unaffordable to most low-income countries along the B&R.
What's more, there is a lack of enforcement mechanisms for arbitration awards. (...)
Finally, because it is based on maritime law, the international
arbitration system mainly deals with disputes on maritime trade. But
B&R disputes are mostly land-based trade disputes.(...)
Der Beitrag schließt mit dem Hinweis:
China already has the capacity to build dispute settlement regimes and institutions. (...)
[A]s of 2017, China had established 11 free trade zones, which can serve
as pilot sites for international arbitration institutions. In 2016, the
Hong Kong International Arbitration Center settled in the China
(Shanghai) Free Trade Zone. Meanwhile, the Shenzhen Court of
International Arbitration has expanded its powers to include
international dispute settlements between governments and enterprises.
MediaWatch ist gespannt, was Peking sich dazu einfallen lässt und wer alles mitmacht.
Dieses Thema hat Ihr/Euer ergebenster MediaWatch Redakteur noch einmal gründlicher für Telepolis aufgearbeitet: Standards setzen.
AntwortenLöschen